AZRAS Evaluation — Project JSON Flow Audit
PATCH 135

Verified current save path:
- Module 3 -> update_module_and_propagate(..., "module3", ...)
- Module 4 -> update_module_and_propagate(..., "module4", ...)
- Module 5 -> update_module_and_propagate(..., "module5", ...)
- Module 6 -> update_module_and_propagate(..., "module6", ...)
- Module 7 -> update_module_and_propagate(..., "module7", ...)

Project JSON:
- module_outputs contains module1 through module9.
- core/project_store.py normalizes missing module_outputs keys.
- Each manual save stores the result under its module key and stores _input_snapshot.
- Automatic propagation recalculates downstream modules only when a usable saved
  input snapshot exists. Otherwise the downstream module remains pending.

Dependency graph confirmed in core/project_coordinator.py:
- module1 -> module2, module3, module5, module9
- module2 -> module4
- module3 -> module4, module7, module8
- module5 -> module4, module6, module7, module8
- module7 -> module6, module8
- module6 -> module8
- module9 -> module7, module8

Recommended manual Evaluation sequence remains:
Module 3 -> Module 4 -> Module 5 -> Module 7 -> Module 6

This sequence is compatible with the dependency graph. Automatic propagation may
refresh already-saved downstream modules after an upstream module changes.

Result of PATCH 135 audit:
- No missing module_outputs key found in Module 3–7 save paths.
- No disconnected save path found.
- No Project JSON structural change is required.

Protection rule:
Do not rename module_outputs/module3...module9 keys or alter dependency edges
without simultaneous verification of 01, 02, and 03_AZRAS_Evaluation_2.
